By G. O. Okeng'o
©
Copyright by Okeng'o Geoffrey Onchong'a, All Rights Reserved August,
2012
The question of the origin and the existence of life in
the universe is a very controversial one. On a very broad spectrum,
the views on this subject, by different individuals, are bound differ
according to whether one adopts a religious standpoint or the
scientific paradigm. On a more general sense, however, the two
pictures seem to complement each other with the former seeking
answers to the questions “why” while the latter attempts to
address the questions “how”. It is on this basis that it can be
argued that science really does not necessarily anyway contradict
religion but in actual sense the two co-exist to serve different
purposes. However, this may not augur well with some schools of
thought who may often want to initiate spirited debates on this
subject (this is allowed!) but whose basis is likely to be due to a number of opposing views which I will discuss in a future edition in this
series.
However, despite this quagmire enigma and the numerous
efforts by scientists to discover other “earths” out there, one
thing is as clear as snow; that we all know of only one place where
life exists and we can see it today, and that is the planet Earth.
But as discussed in my previous article titled “How Big is the
Universe?” the Earth occupies only a very tiny portion
of the whole universe and using the numbers I provided this ratio
comes to about 1:3,000,000,000,000,000,000; that is one part in three
billion billion kilometers, where one billion is the number one (1)
followed by nine (9) 'zeros'. That's the region of space occupied by
us in the universe!
While you digest these numbers, it is also important to
further reinforce the fact that the Earth is just but only one
planet in our solar system that consists of eight planets (following
the demotion of Pluto- I will discuss this in a future edition!),
located third from the Sun with Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter,
Saturn, Uranus and Neptune being the first, second, fourth, fifth,
sixth, seventh and eight respectively, and this system, together with
a number of minor objects including dwarf planets, asteroids,
meteoroids and rock debris are what makes up our solar system.
A solar system by definition is an 'arrangement' of
planets and other smaller bodies that orbit a central star under
mutual gravitational attraction. But how many stars (like the Sun) do
we have in the universe? How many of them have their own planetary
systems? Is there a possibility that some of the planets going around
those suns (stars) or some of them could be Earth-like? Could these
planets be harboring intelligent life or any other form of life? Are
we alone in the universe?
To answer this questions, it's important to draw your
attention to the following known facts: scientists estimate that
there are about 1 trillion stars in our galaxy and over 100
billion galaxies in the universe. Now, if we temporarily assume
that each galaxy is a typical medium-sized galaxy, like our own Milky
Way, (not a bad assumption since many of such galaxies are known e.g
Andromeda), the total number of stars like the Sun in the universe
comes to about 10,000 billion billion! Simple mathematical
probability then undoubtedly leads to the (not) so surprising result
that it will be very 'selfish' to argue that we are the only
creatures existing out here... If true this is likely to violate the
fundamental law of natural economics: “thou shalt not waste
space”.
But why do scientists care about the existence of life
outside the Earth? (extraterrestrial life) or other creatures to be
precise? How do they find it? What do they look for? And what have
they found so far?
The first question is tricky but easy to answer, the
rest are a subject of ongoing research and can only be answered
tentatively.
Well, scientists care about existence of intelligent
life elsewhere in the universe because that is science; they
are scientists, so they do science! On the other hand, the question
of whether we are alone in the universe has vexed humans for a number
of centuries and according to a recent television survey in UK
published in the Mail Online (29th June, 2012), this is the top-most question among the top mysteries that many people
are most desperate to see solved. Second on this list is the cure for
cancer, followed by a prove if God exists and as you might have
guessed.... further down near the bottom of the list is the question
of why the fridge lights do not go off when the fridge door is
closed!
The following facts sum up answers to the questions
above:
No
contact yet with an “Extraterrestrial"
You might have heard, (or probably claimed yourself)
that they (you) have been visited by aliens or sighted some
Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO's). But how true is this?
And what does science say about this? To begin with, no ordinary
mortal person can completely say that such creatures do not exist at
all or that they haven't visited anybody. However, these claims
remain untrue scientifically (unless one captures the alien for
everybody to see or captures the UFO so that it can undergo lab
verification tests to show that it's indeed an extraterrestrial!).
Beyond that, such claims remains entirely unfounded and hence untrue (at least scientifically).
To try and verify this idea, astronomers have for many years scanned
the sky using powerful telescopes to detect weak signals from
extraterrestrial beings but so far nothing has been detected. Relaxed
now?
For
Life to Exist conditions must be “Just Right”
For a planet to support life, very stringent conditions
must be fulfilled. It must for instance among other things; contain
sufficient liquid water, be at the “right” distance from it's sun
(star) and must be neither too hot nor too cold otherwise all the
liquid water would evaporate or freeze, hence support no life.
No
spontaneous life
According to scientific findings, for life to develop,
there must exist specific initial conditions. If such conditions are
not met in a planet, no life would develop.
Vast
distances makes finding extraterrestrial life (im)possible
If we could send humans onboard of the Apollo 11 mission
that landed men on the moon, the journey to the nearest star Proxima
Centauri would take about a million years. What if we can make it
accelerate? You can quip! Well, if we send an unmanned mission
cruising at the incredibly high one-tenth the speed of light
(which is about 30,000 km a second!), the journey would still take
over 40 years. However, the success of this will also depend on
whether the spacecraft would survive tearing apart from violent
collisions with the thousands of grains and loose particles present
in space (which is most unlikely). But let us be optimistic enough
and assume that the spacecraft survives and completes the journey.
Fuel economics then dictates that an enormous amount of power (or
fuel) would be needed to fuel this journey. Estimates (it is easy to
perform a simple calculation to prove this) show that the amount of
energy needed to fuel such a voyage would be equivalent to the total
electric power consumption required to power the whole world for one
month! Would it then be possible to send missions to other stars in
the universe? Simple estimates tells us further (against the wishes
of scientists) that not even a combination of all world economies
would have the capacity to fuel such a project!
Now you know better; there is simply not enough
technological manpower (at the moment) to enable us make contact with
our 'friends' out there, so are we alone in the universe? Or
what do you think?
No comments:
Post a Comment